Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2019

Settling SEC Enforcement Actions

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

This article discusses the Securities and Exchange Commission settlement process, focusing on key guiding principles that counsel should have in mind when negotiating with the SEC.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Introduction

This article discusses the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or Commission) settlement process, focusing on key guiding principles that counsel should have in mind when negotiating with the SEC.

Why settle? Why not fight? These are questions that any party caught up in litigation will eventually face. In the context of an impending SEC enforcement action, however, these questions can be challenging to assess.

If a party is unable to convince the SEC staff (the Staff) that no enforcement action is warranted, the decision whether to litigate or settle with the SEC is akin to a Hobson's choice – in this case, the need to choose one of two equally unpleasant alternatives. For some, the decision to settle is a pragmatic business or personal decision having less to do with the relative merits of the case than with the expense of litigation and desire to put the matter to rest. For others, the decision hinges on mitigating the potential

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from