Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2014

SEC Staff Closes Loophole On BDC Asset Coverage Requirements

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The SEC closed a loophole that allowed business development companies with wholly owned Small Business Investment Company subsidiaries to avoid meeting asset coverage requirements.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In a Guidance Update published on June 30, 2014 by the SEC's Division of Investment Management, the staff closed a loophole that allowed business development companies (BDCs) with wholly owned Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) subsidiaries to avoid meeting asset coverage requirements when the SBIC subsidiaries issue debt that is not guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA).

Sections 18(a) and 61(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) generally require BDCs to meet asset coverage requirements when they issue "senior securities," including debt instruments. A BDC may be deemed an indirect issuer of any class of "senior security" issued by its direct or indirect wholly owned SBIC subsidiaries.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from