Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2020

SEC Issues New FAQ On Reporting Disciplinary History On Form CRS

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The SEC staff updated its FAQ for Form CRS to make explicit that a firm must answer "yes" or "no" to the question of whether the firm or its employees has a legal or disciplinary history.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The SEC staff updated its FAQ for Form CRS to make explicit that a firm must answer "yes" or "no" to the question of whether the firm or its employees has a legal or disciplinary history. SEC Chair Jay Clayton, along with Dalia Blass, Director of Investment Management, and Brett Redfearn, Director of Trading Markets, issued a joint statement touting the value of Form CRS to investors and, more specifically, the value of the disclosure of a firm's disciplinary history.

Commentary

In view of the criticism, both explicit and implicit, that Regulation Best Interest has received from various parties, Chair Clayton is making a good effort to sell its benefits and to forestall the various states from going their own way and creating their own diverse regulations regarding the obligations that broker-dealers and advisers have to their clients.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from