Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2026

SEC Ends “Gag Rule” For Settlements

Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Contributor
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

The Firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon’s London group offers an elite, globally recognised product liability...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP

On May 18, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it was rescinding its so-called “gag rule,” which has for several decades prohibited parties who settled with SEC from denying...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
John Schleppenbach
John Schleppenbach

On May 18, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it was rescinding its so-called “gag rule,” which has for several decades prohibited parties who settled with SEC from denying the agency’s allegations against them. This significant change will undoubtedly impact how various individuals and entities—e.g., corporations, officers and directors—assess the costs and benefits of settling with SEC as well as the public framing of such resolutions. Additionally, the change may affect how SEC generally, and the Division of Enforcement in particular, makes decisions concerning the initiation and resolution of SEC enforcement actions. 

The Gag Rule

For more than 50 years, SEC’s Rule of Procedure 202.5(e) expressed a policy that, in the agency’s lawsuits and administrative proceedings, it was “important to avoid creating, or permitting to be created, an impression that a decree is being entered or a sanction imposed, when the conduct alleged did not, in fact,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from