Under rule 206(4)-2 of the Advisers Act, otherwise
known as the Custody Rule, it is a fraudulent practice for a
registered investment adviser to have custody of client funds or
securities, unless the adviser takes certain required steps to
protect the assets. Over the past year the SEC's Enforcement
division has been relatively active investigating and enforcing the
rule – which, at most, requires a showing of negligence
– with a number of complicated provisions that can trip up
the uninformed.
Recently, the SEC brought enforcement actions that highlight two
key areas under the Custody Rule that can result in liability.
First, in addition to maintaining client funds and securities with
a "qualified custodian," advisers with custody of the
funds and securities must obtain either (i) a "surprise
examination" of those assets annually from an independent
public accountant or (ii) an annual audit of its financial
statements by an independent public accounting firm that