Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2024

Precision In Drafting–Part Deux

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

A new decision of Delaware's Court of Chancery addresses an interesting intersection of recent attention to entities potentially moving their places of incorporation from Delaware to some other...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

A new decision of Delaware's Court of Chancery addresses an interesting intersection of recent attention to entities potentially moving their places of incorporation from Delaware to some other jurisdiction–like Nevada–and 2022 amendments to Section 266 of the DGCL that changed the historic need for a unanimous stockholder vote to enact such a conversion to the need to seek and receive only the vote of a simple majority of the shares entitled to vote (matching the voting requirements for a merger or consolidation under Section 251 of the DGCL).

Last week on this blog I wrote about a new Court of Chancery decision demonstrating the need for precision in drafting LLC agreements–specifically in how those agreements might address information rights of LLC Members. Yesterday, in Gunderson v. The Trade Desk, Inc., et al. (C.A. No. 2024-1029-PAF)(Nov. 6, 2024), the court makes the same point, but in this instance it makes clear that need for precision applies to provisions

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

See more popular content from