Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2019

Post-Cyan Ruling On Discovery Stay

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

The opinion is unique because, unlike the other state court decisions, it interprets Cyan to apply the PSLRA's discovery stay to Securities Act suits in state courts.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In May 15, 2019, a Connecticut Superior Court found that defendants in a claim under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) were entitled to the mandatory discovery stay pending a motion to dismiss under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA)—a significant ruling due to its reasoning and the possibility that other state courts may follow the decision.

Background

The Securities Act states that suits brought under the Act may be filed in either state or federal courts and includes an anti-removal provision that prevents defendants from removing a case from state to federal court.

The Securities Act also allows for class-action suits. In 1995, in order "to stem perceived abuses of the class-action vehicle," Congress amended the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the primary mechanism for bringing anti-fraud class action suits) and enacted the PSLRA. In its discovery stay subsection, the PSLRA states: "In any

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from