Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2018

MSRB Requests Comment On Agency Execution Procedures

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The draft interpretive guidance would seek to clarify that a dealer does not need to post bids on multiple venues in order to satisfy its best execution obligations under MSRB Rule G-18.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

The MSRB requested comments on draft interpretive guidance regarding two agency trading practices in the municipal market: (i) "pennying" and (ii) posting bids-wanted on multiple trading platforms.

"Pennying" refers to the practice of (i) a dealer posting a request for a bid on a customer's securities and (ii) the dealer eventually buying the securities itself by either matching the best bid received or beating that bid by an insignificant amount. According to the MSRB, over the long run, that practice may tend to injure customers because it discourages municipal firms from responding to requests for quotes since the firm asking for the quote always has what is, in effect, a "last look" right to pull back the securities and take them internally. The draft interpretive guidance would consider that the use of bids-wanted "(whether distributed via an [alternative trading system] or broker's broker) solely for price discovery purposes would be an unfair practice within

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from