Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2018

Is Your Director Compensation Program Vulnerable To Attack?

A recent case offers a fresh reminder that directors must satisfy their fiduciary obligations when setting their own compensation.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

recent case offers a fresh reminder that directors must satisfy their fiduciary obligations when setting their own compensation.

In a derivative action against the non-employee directors of OvaScience, Inc., a stockholder alleged that the non-employee directors had breached their fiduciary duties and wasted corporate assets by paying themselves excessive compensation. In 2015, for example, all of OvaScience's non-employee directors received compensation of at least $300,000 (substantially all of which represented the fair value of equity awards granted during the year), and two directors received more than $500,000.

Under Delaware law, OvaScience's directors had the authority to set their own compensation, but they were nonetheless required to satisfy the heightened fiduciary standards applicable to transactions in which they have a conflict of interest. In such a case, interested directors bear the burden of proving that the transaction is "entirely fair" to the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from