Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2009

Inside M&A - March/April 2009

In the wake of the continuing credit crunch, the use of “reverse termination” or “reverse break-up” fees has expanded beyond the ranks of private equity buyers and been adopted by strategic acquirors.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

STRATEGIC BUYERS DISCOVER REVERSE TERMINATION FEES

By Dennis J. White

In the wake of the continuing credit crunch, the use of "reverse termination" or "reverse break-up" fees has expanded beyond the ranks of private equity buyers and been adopted by strategic acquirors.  This phenomena is still evolving, and questions remain as to the appropriate size of such a fee, as well as the basis upon which it will be triggered and a strategic buyer can exit a deal through its payment.

Reverse termination fees have in recent years become relatively common in private equity acquisitions.  Sellers pushed such fees in order to enhance certainty of closing.  Private equity buyers viewed such fees, when coupled with an exclusive remedy provision, as providing a ceiling to their exposure.  When the credit crunch hit, some private equity buyers used such fees as a means to terminate transactions that they no longer found attractive.  Jilted sellers, with their reputations

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from