Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MARCH 2012

"Forgotten" Say-On-Pay Frequency Disclosure

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

In 2011, public companies conducted their first shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation and also asked shareholders how often the company should conduct future say-on-pay votes. Companies were required to report the results of their shareholders meetings in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after each meeting.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In 2011, public companies conducted their first shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation and also asked shareholders how often the company should conduct future say-on-pay votes. Companies were required to report the results of their shareholders meetings in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after each meeting. In addition, each company was required to inform shareholders whether future say-on-pay votes would occur every one, two, or three years until it holds its next frequency vote.

Many companies either disclosed their frequency decision in their original Form 8-K or subsequent Form 10-Q filing.

In an action that has caused confusion, representatives of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance recently announced, in the Practising Law Institute's "The SEC Speaks in 2012" conference, that a number of issuers "forgot" to report their frequency decision in accordance with the SEC's rules and interpretations. A company's failure to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from