Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2018

FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy: Cooperation As A Mitigating Factor

This issue of the Ethics & Compliance in the Americas newsletter covers what the DOJ considers as cooperation, as updated by the new FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

This issue of the Ethics & Compliance in the Americas newsletter covers what the DOJ considers as cooperation, as updated by the new FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.

Under the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, there will be a presumption of declination if a company self-discloses misconduct, fully cooperates and remediates, absent aggravating circumstances. If a criminal resolution is warranted, there will be a reduction of the fine. Even in situations where there has been no self-disclosure, the company may still have a reduction of the fine, as long as it fully cooperates and timely and appropriately remediates.

The importance of cooperation as a mitigating factor is thus very clear. The US Attorneys' Manual (USAM, Title 9-28.700) explains that: "With cooperation by the corporation, the government may be able to reduce tangible losses, limit damage to reputation, and preserve assets for restitution. At the same time, cooperation may benefit the corporation –

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from