Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2024

Earnouts: Recent Delaware Cases Highlight Important Drafting Considerations

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Earnouts in acquisition agreements are commonly used to bridge valuation gaps between a buyer and a seller. The buyer agrees to pay additional consideration to the seller if the acquired business...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Earnouts in acquisition agreements are commonly used to bridge valuation gaps between a buyer and a seller. The buyer agrees to pay additional consideration to the seller if the acquired business achieves specific post-closing milestones, and the seller often negotiates certain contractual assurances with respect to the buyer's post-closing operation of the business, typically defining the "efforts" the buyer must undertake to support achieving the milestones.

The Delaware Chancery Court recently issued three decisions interpreting generally seller-favorable "outward-facing" efforts standards and generally buyer-favorable "inward-facing" efforts standards, as well as addressing a buyer's earnout-related claim for fraud by the seller.1 "Outward-facing" efforts standards tend to be seller-friendly because they look to an industry standard or industry participant(s) as a point of comparison when evaluating a buyer's efforts, whereas "inward-facing" efforts standards

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from