Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2021

Diversity In The Boardroom: A Litigation Update

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

In a prior alert, we noted that a number of shareholder lawsuits were brought during 2020 in which large corporations and their directors were accused of fiduciary breaches and securities law violations...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In a prior alert, we noted that a number of shareholder lawsuits were brought during 2020 in which large corporations and their directors were accused of fiduciary breaches and securities law violations tied to the alleged failure to fulfill companies' diversity aspirations. On March 19, 2021, in the first ruling on a motion to dismiss in these actions, a California federal court dismissed claims against Facebook and its directors as failing to meet both substantive and procedural pleading standards.

The decision by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in Ocegueda v. Zuckerberg, Case No. 20-cv-04444-LB (N.D. Cal. March 19, 2021), dismissed the federal claims with leave to amend and dismissed the state claims without prejudice to reassertion in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The decision is an initial indication that these suits face traditional hurdles to assertion of shareholder claims. Moreover, it raises questions as to whether the novel assertion

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from