Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2022

Courts Strike Down California Diversity Statutes

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

Two recent rulings by California state court judges have struck-down California statutes that were intended to foster diversity at California-based public companies.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Two recent rulings by California state court judges have struck-down California statutes that were intended to foster diversity at California-based public companies. In the first case, Crest v. Padilla, No. 20-STCV-37513 ("Padilla I"), the court held that a California statute – Assembly Bill 979 (or AB 979) – that sought to expand boardroom diversity by requiring such companies to seat at least one person from historically underrepresented communities, was unconstitutional. In the most recent case, captioned Crest v. Padilla, No. 19-STCV-27561 ("Padilla II"), the court similarly ruled that a statute – Senate Bill 826 (or SB 826) – requiring California-based public companies to seat a minimum number of women on the boards of directors of those companies, was unconstitutional. We previously wrote about AB 979 here and SB 826 here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from