Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 OCTOBER 2021

Claw Backs And Preemption

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Explore more from Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was reopening the comment period on proposed rules for listing standards for the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was reopening the comment period on proposed rules for listing standards for the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation.   One issue that I doubt that they are looking for is whether stock exchange listing rules can preempt state labor and employment laws.   This was an issue that I raised over six years ago in a post.  Section 221 of the California Labor Code has long provided that "It shall be unlawful for any employer to collect or receive from an employee any part of wages theretofore paid by said employer to said employee".  In this regard, some readers may recall this 2013 post discussing Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain's opinion in McDaniel v. Wells Fargo Invs., LLC, 717 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 2013) in which he states that SRO rules have the "force of law".  

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from