Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MAY 2020

5 Securities Litigation Questions Raised By Del. Forum Ruling

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

If the term "hotly anticipated corporate law decision" is not a contradiction, it surely applies to the Delaware Supreme Court's recent ruling in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

If the term "hotly anticipated corporate law decision" is not a contradiction, it surely applies to the Delaware Supreme Court's recent ruling in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi.1

The question posed there was deceptively simple: May a corporation adopt a charter provision requiring that certain federal securities law claims against the corporation and its directors and officers be brought only in federal court?

Three corporations set to go public included language in their charters identifying federal court as the "exclusive" forum for claims brought under the federal Securities Act of 1933. In response, a stockholder brought suit seeking to have those forum selection provisions declared invalid.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from