Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 FEBRUARY 2017

Plaintiffs' Fraudulent Joinder Tactic Results In Dismissal

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Defendants successfully argued "fraudulent joinder" in Bahalim v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., winning dismissal of the case in its entirety.

United StatesConsumer Protection

Defendants successfully argued "fraudulent joinder" in Bahalim v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., winning dismissal of the case in its entirety.1 The case was decided on Plaintiffs' motion to remand and Defendants' motions to dismiss after Defendant Ferring Pharmaceuticals removed the suit to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.  The court rejected Plaintiffs' argument that the forum defendant rule applied and ultimately dismissed the case.

Background

Ferring manufactures and distributes Bravelle, a drug designed to treat infertility in women.  Plaintiffs, who were citizens of Texas and Utah, sued Ferring and Stericycle in Illinois state court.  They alleged that Ferring recalled multiple lots of the drug that did not meet potency specifications and that Stericycle administered the recall.  Plaintiffs further alleged that they consumed Bravelle from the recalled lots and asserted claims based on negligence, strict liability, product liability, and express

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from