Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2026

NAD Addresses Disclosure Requirements For Incentivized Reviews

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

When Zuru ran a program encouraging consumers to post product reviews in exchange for reimbursement, Procter & Gamble challenged the practice before NAD, arguing that consumers weren't instructed to disclose the incentive. While Zuru maintained the program wasn't problematic since reimbursement didn't depend on positive sentiment, the company agreed to require clear disclosure of the financial incentive in future reviews.

United StatesConsumer Protection

Procter & Gamble recently filed an NAD challenge against Zuru, a New Zealand-based consumer products company, over a program Zuru ran to encouarge consumers to buy Zuru’s products, post reviews on retailer websites, and submit screenshots of those reviews to obtain reimbursement. Consumers were allegedly not instructed to disclose that the reviews were incentivized. 

Zuru responded that the program wasn’t problematic because reimbursement wasn’t contingent on positive sentiment, favorable ratings, or endorsement of any product attributes. Nevertheless, the company volunteered to modify its practices by instructing consumers to clearly and conspicuously disclose that Zuru had reimbursed the purchase price of the reviewed product. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from