Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2019

Agencies Clarify SAR Obligations For Hemp Transactions

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, FinCEN, the OCC and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (collectively, the "agencies") clarified the legal status of hemp and Suspicious Activity Report

United StatesCannabis & Hemp

The Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, FinCEN, the OCC and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (collectively, the "agencies") clarified the legal status of hemp and Suspicious Activity Report ("SAR") obligations for banks under the Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA").

The agencies opined that:

  • banks do not have to file a SAR for customers engaged in hemp production solely because the business involves hemp, since it is no longer considered a controlled substance, but still must file a SAR if there are indicia of "suspicious activity";
  • customers of banks engaged in hemp-related businesses are themselves accountable for complying with the related requirements; and
  • banks must establish and maintain a BSA/AML compliance program that can sufficiently address the "complexity and risks involved."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from