Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2012

U.S. Merger Control: A Discussion With V&E About Process And Current Trends

While the U.S. was an early leader in applying antitrust concepts, it continues to be a leader in applying the most modern technology and economics to merger control.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

First published in Acquisition International, October 2012

While the U.S. was an early leader in applying antitrust concepts, it continues to be a leader in applying the most modern technology and economics to merger control. U.S. merger control operates very differently than outside the U.S. because the American filing process is much more predictable than the non-U.S. process and the investigatory process is much more document and data intensive than outside of the U.S. We also note that the process is plagued with inefficiencies and burdensome information requests.

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") is the statute that governs merger control in the United States. A filing is required and parties must observe the applicable waiting period if the size of transaction is greater than $272.8 million (all of the statutory thresholds are adjusted annually). Transactions between $68.2 million and $272.8 million are reportable if one

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from