Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2014

Seventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument On Motorola Mobility v. AU Optronics

The panel asked numerous questions regarding the fact that the transactions at issue in this litigation occurred abroad.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On November 12, 2014, the parties in Motorola Mobility v. AU Optronics reargued their case to a three judge panel of the Seventh Circuit – the same panel that ruled on the case earlier this year. The United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") also had the opportunity to argue its position in this closely-watched Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ("FTAIA") case.

This case has received ample coverage on this blog (click here, here and here to read more). In March 2014, the Seventh Circuit rejected Motorola's antitrust arguments seeking billions of dollars in damages from a group of liquid crystal display ("LCD") panel manufacturers. The Court held that the alleged wrongdoing was "too remote" under the FTAIA to have a direct effect on United States commerce. Less than four months later, this decision was vacated after Motorola petitioned for an en banc rehearing, and the parties were given an opportunity to submit briefs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from