Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2022

On The Board: DOJ Gets First Win In Criminal No-Poach Prosecution

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Last week, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division ("DOJ") announced that health care staffing company VDA OC LLC pleaded guilty to criminal antitrust charges for engaging in a "no-poach"...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Last week, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division ("DOJ") announced that health care staffing company VDA OC LLC pleaded guilty to criminal antitrust charges for engaging in a "no-poach" conspiracy relating to hiring arrangements for school nurses. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada sentenced the company to pay a fine of $62,000 and restitution to the affected workers of $72,000. This represents the first successful criminal prosecution amidst the DOJ's recent increased focus on bringing criminal antitrust charges relating to labor markets.

In 2021, the DOJ brought criminal charges against VDA and its-then regional manager Ryan Hee for violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Specifically, the company has said the agreement involved one email and one telephone conversation and was "extremely limited" in nature. The agreement lasted for a total of nine months-beginning just a day after the DOJ first announced its intention to start bringing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from