Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

Massachusetts Courts Continue To Reject Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine

Judge Janet L. Sanders of the Superior Court's Business Litigation Session has continued the trend of Massachusetts courts refusing to recognize the inevitable disclosure doctrine.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Judge Janet L. Sanders of the Superior Court's Business Litigation Session has continued the trend of Massachusetts courts refusing to recognize the inevitable disclosure doctrine.

In The Gillette Company v. Craig Provost et al, Civ. Action No. 15-0149 (Mass. Sup. Dec. 22, 2015), Gillette moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent its former counsel and ShaveLogic's current general counsel, Chester Cekala, from providing any legal advice regarding Gillette's patents, not only with respect to patent validity but also on infringement and scope. Although Cekala's non-compete agreement with Gillette had long expired, Gillette contended that Cekala's legal advice inevitably disclosed Gillette's trade secrets to its competitor given his experience with the company.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from