Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2012

MAP Policies And Internet Dealers

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

A notable recent decision by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York holds that enforcement of a Minimum Advertised Price.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Originally published Spring/Summer 2012

A notable recent decision by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York holds that enforcement of a Minimum Advertised Price (MAP) policy against Internet retailers does not amount to Minimum Resale Price Maintenance, notwithstanding the contention regularly made by such retailers that prices appearing on websites really amount to selling prices rather than advertised prices.1

In that case, Worldhomecenter.com, Inc. v. Franke Consumer Products, Inc., the district court also held, in accord with an earlier holding of a New York state court, that Minimum Resale Price Maintenance is not per seillegal under New York's antitrust law. The New York Attorney General had taken a public position to the contrary.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from