Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2015

If You Are On A State Regulatory Board Or Regulated By One, Read This Article

State governments are often immune from antitrust liability, but a recent U.S. Supreme case demonstrates that is not always the case.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

State governments are often immune from antitrust liability, but a recent U.S. Supreme case demonstrates that is not always the case.

The federal government recently brought an antitrust suit against the North Carolina agency that regulates dentists. The FTC claimed the agency unfairly attempted to keep non-dentists from performing cosmetic teeth-whitening procedures, even though teeth-whitening does not constitute the practice of dentistry or endanger the public.

In North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, the Supreme Court held that state regulatory agencies run by active market participants may be liable for antitrust violations unless the "the challenged restraint [is] clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed as state policy" and "the policy [is] actively supervised by the State." The Court held that the North Carolina agency was not actively supervised by the state when it sought to close down cosmetic teeth-whitening

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from