Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2019

HSBC v. Commission: Just Give Them A Reason

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

On 24 September 2019, the EU General Court (GC) handed down its judgment in HSBC v. Commission.[1] Consistent with recent precedent, the GC reaffirmed the European Commission ("Commission")'s

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On 24 September 2019, the EU General Court (GC) handed down its judgment in HSBC v. Commission.1 Consistent with recent precedent, the GC reaffirmed the European Commission (“Commission”)’s duty to provide sufficient reasons when explaining fine calculations in cartel cases and annulled the fine imposed on HSBC in full as a result of the Commission’s insufficient reasoning.

The GC also provided clarity on other key aspects of cartel rules: namely, ‘by object’ infringements, the evidentiary requirements to establish a single and continuous infringement (SCI), and the Commission’s obligation to uphold a non-settling party’s presumption of innocence in hybrid settlement procedures.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from