Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2006

FTC Draws Line in the Sand Regarding Patent Holder’s Behavior in Standard-Setting Process

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

FTC Finds that Rambus Inc. Engaged in Deceptive and, Consequently, Exclusionary Conduct in Violation of Antitrust Laws

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Mintz Levin Antitrust And Federal Regulation Group
Mintz Levin Antitrust And Federal Regulation Group
Author LinkedIn connections

FTC Finds that Rambus Inc. Engaged in Deceptive and, Consequently, Exclusionary Conduct in Violation of Antitrust Laws

On August 2, 2006, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its unanimous 120-page decision finding that Rambus Inc., a maker of computer industry-standard SDRAM and DDR SDRAM memory chips, has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA) by using deception to monopolize the market for dynamic random access memory chips. The case will now move to a remedy stage.

The FTC’s decision is based upon Rambus’s intentional misrepresentations to competitors in the context of an industry-wide standard-setting body; a brief recounting of the basis for the FTC’s finding may therefore be helpful for businesses who engage in standard-setting or other cooperative efforts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from