Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2014

Five Million Penalty Is Stark Reminder About "Gun Jumping"

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

On November 7, 2014, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ announced that it had imposed a civil penalty of $3.8M and disgorgement of $1.15M in profits on Flakeboard America Limited for "gun jumping".

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On November 7, 2014, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice ("DOJ") announced that it had imposed a civil penalty of $3.8M and disgorgement of $1.15M in profits on Flakeboard America Limited (and its parent company) for "gun jumping," that is, assuming beneficial and operational control over the seller, in this case SierraPine, in violation of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 ("HSR Act") and Section 1 of the Sherman Act. This case is notable because it marks the first "gun jumping" enforcement action in several years and the first time disgorgement has been obtained in the context of a gun jumping violation.1 In addition, the asset purchase agreement ("APA") contained an unusual provision requiring the seller to shut one of its mill operations priorto closing. The case thus provided the DOJ with an opportunity to provide some basic guidance for the conduct of a buyer and seller prior to reaching a definitive agreement and, after a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from