Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 NOVEMBER 2024

Eerie Exchanges? US Antitrust Agencies Renew Focus On Information Exchange Practices

Linklaters LLP
Linklaters LLP
Contributor
Linklaters LLP

Linklaters LLP

As a leading global law firm, Linklaters aims to build relationships that last. Major companies and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Linklaters LLP

U.S. antitrust enforcers at the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have been focused on expanding their focus on information sharing practices...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

U.S. antitrust enforcers at the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have been focused on expanding their focus on information sharing practices in recent enforcement and policy statements. Most recently, the DOJ laid out its views in a Statement of Interest supporting private plaintiffs in a case targeting information sharing in pork production, where the DOJ itself has been active.

Through these policy initiatives, the Agencies have gradually walked back long-established guidance on safeguards on sharing information without raising concerns. While information sharing has primarily been used as evidence of anticompetitive agreements in the US, the DOJ through recent enforcement has also pushed to expand the law on standalone theories of harm. In doing so, they are increasingly focused on the roles of data vendors, software providers, and consultants who serve as middlemen in aggregating and sharing data among competitors.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from