Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MAY 2012

Blue Cross Win In "Most Favored Nation" Clause Antitrust Case

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright is a full-service law firm with more than 550 lawyers, serving clients across the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dickinson Wright PLLC

On March 30, United States District Court Judge Denise Page Hood (E.D. Mich.) handed Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan a victory, dismissing an antitrust action filed against it by the City of Pontiac in which the City alleged that Blue Cross’s use of "most favored nation" clauses in its provider contracts violated the antitrust laws.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

On March 30, United States District Court Judge Denise Page Hood (E.D. Mich.) handed Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan a victory, dismissing an antitrust action filed against it by the City of Pontiac in which the City alleged that Blue Cross's use of "most favored nation" clauses in its provider contracts violated the antitrust laws. (City of Pontiac v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Case No. 11-10276, Eastern District of Michigan).

The action, which was filed by the City in January of 2011 against Blue Cross and twenty-two Michigan hospitals, alleged that the defendants' inclusion of "most favored nation" clauses in their provider contracts, requiring the hospitals to charge other insurers more than they charged to Blue Cross for provider services, constituted a per se violation of the antitrust laws.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from