Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 NOVEMBER 2010

Antitrust and Federal Regulation Alert: Aggressive Consumer Protection Enforcement

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The current Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is very focused on aggressive enforcement of the consumer protection laws.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
Mintz Levin Antitrust And Federal Regulation Group
Mintz Levin Antitrust And Federal Regulation Group
Author LinkedIn connections

The current Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is very focused on aggressive enforcement of the consumer protection laws. It has announced particular emphasis on enforcement actions against marketers that utilize deceptive or misleading health-related claims. On October 21, 2010, the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court decision finding Defendants, marketers of popular dietary supplements, liable for deceptive advertising and ordering them to disgorge more than $48.7 million in profits. The FTC's complaint alleged that Defendants had no "reasonable basis" to support the health-related claims in their infomercials.

The First Circuit's decision is a ringing endorsement of, and buttresses, the Commission's hard-nosed approach in this area. Now armed with an appellate affirmance of several important points, despite the recent election results that might suggest otherwise, one would expect this enforcement program to continue unabated. The Court affirmed the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from