Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 AUGUST 2021

A Changing Landscape: The DOJ Antitrust Division's Use Of Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

The Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice (the Division) historically has disfavored using deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to resolve criminal antitrust violations.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice (the Division) historically has disfavored using deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to resolve criminal antitrust violations. But according to a recent speech by Acting Assistant Attorney General Richard Powers, "the landscape has changed over the years." Acting AAG Powers' speech provides companies facing criminal charges for antitrust violations with a clearer path for resolving a case short of a criminal conviction.

Under the Division's Corporate Leniency Policy—which is unique to antitrust crimes—the first company to self-report and meet the Policy's requirements is entitled to a non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and, in the past, the Division required all other companies to plead guilty or face indictment. The Division began to change its approach in July 2019, when Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim announced the Division's new policy concerning antitrust compliance. AAG Delrahim announced that,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from