Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2015

9th Circuit Applies Antitrust Exemption In San Jose MLB Team Relocation Case

San Jose planned to welcome the Oakland A's to a new stadium in San Jose, which is within the geographic territory allocated by MLB to the San Francisco Giants.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

In City of San Jose v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Case No. 14-15139 (9th Cir. Jan 15, 2015), the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals applied the judge-made antitrust exemption for baseball to bar a challenge by the City of San Jose, California to a rule adopted by Major League Baseball (MLB) that three-quarters of MLB teams must approve a baseball franchise relocation.

San Jose planned to welcome the Oakland A's to a new stadium in San Jose, which is within the geographic territory allocated by MLB to the San Francisco Giants. That fact required, under league rules, approval of the relocation by three-quarters of MLB's members. After MLB―in San Jose's view―delayed a vote, San Jose sued MLB, arguing, among other things, that the delay was an attempt to stymie the relocation and preserve the Giants' local monopoly. MLB argued that the baseball exemption barred San Jose's suit.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from