Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2014

'United States v. Bazaarvoice': A Cautionary Antitrust Tale for High-Tech Mergers

The DOJ enforcement action against Bazaarvoice's 2012 acquisition of rival PowerReviews is a reminder of important principles for antitrust enforcement in high-tech industries.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The recently concluded Department of Justice enforcement action against Bazaarvoice, Inc.'s 2012 acquisition of rival PowerReviews, Inc. is a reminder of important principles for antitrust enforcement in high-tech industries:

  • First, the government scrutinizes transactions that do not have to be reported under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; the fact that a deal is not reportable is not a "free pass" under antitrust law;
  • Second, internal company documents, particularly deal related documents, can have a huge impact on the outcome; care should be taken in preparing documents anytime a deal may raise antitrust issues;
  • Third, while the fact that high-tech markets are dynamic is an important factor in an antitrust analysis, it is not an automatic winner; here, the DOJ and the Court rejected the arguments that innovation and new entry would constrain Bazaarvoice from exercising market power; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from