Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2008

The Bunkers Convention - FAQ´s

Reed Smith
Explore more from Reed Smith

The Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001 and it is enacted in the United Kingdom by The Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) (Bunkers Convention) Regulations 2006.

United KingdomTransport
Ron Clark
Ron Clark
Richard Harvey
Richard Harvey
Author LinkedIn connections

When does it enter into force?

It applies to any occurrence on or after 21 November 2008

What is its full title?

The Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001 and it is enacted in the United Kingdom by The Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) (Bunkers Convention) Regulations 2006.

Why is it needed?

According to the UK P&I Club, half of all claims involving damage by pollution involved ships not carrying oil cargo at all.

Presently, however, there is no liability & compensation regime for spills of bunker oil. This Convention covers oil spills from ships other than tankers carrying bulk oil as cargo and therefore fills the gap left by the CLC & Fund Conventions but is a free standing instrument modelled on the above.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

A Guide For Businesses Considering Self-driving Fleets

Self-driving vehicles could transform commercial fleets, but the UK's new Automated Vehicles Act 2024 creates a complex regulatory framework that redistributes legal responsibility between fleet operators, vehicle occupants, and automated driving system providers. Before committing to significant investment in automated cars, vans, HGVs or passenger vehicles, general counsel and procurement teams must understand what the technology is legally authorised to do, who carries each responsibility
United KingdomTransport
Weightmans LLP
Weightmans LLP
Article

Supply Chain Market Update: Rates Hold High As Trucking And Air Stay Tight While Ocean Shows Early Signs Of Stabilizing

Transportation rates remain elevated across all major modes as capacity constraints persist in trucking and air freight, while ocean markets show early signs of stabilization following inventory front-loading activity. Despite some moderation from peak levels, rates across global shipping, air cargo, and North American trucking continue to run significantly above prior-year benchmarks due to ongoing network disruptions and structural capacity limitations.
United KingdomTransport
AlixPartners Asia LLC
AlixPartners Asia LLC
Article

UK Supreme Court Confirms Buyers’ Loss-of-bargain Damages Under The 2012 Norwegian Saleform

The UK Supreme Court has ruled on whether buyers can recover loss of bargain damages when cancelling a ship sale contract under the 2012 Norwegian Saleform due to a seller's late delivery caused by proven negligence. The decision clarifies the scope of compensation available under clause 14 when sellers miss the cancelling date, potentially exposing sellers to significant market-difference damages in rising markets.
United KingdomTransport
Bech-Bruun
Bech-Bruun
Article

Hostile UAS Operations: Aviation Resilience And Liability

Recent drone incidents at Leipzig/Halle Airport and in Lithuanian airspace have exposed critical vulnerabilities in European aviation security, raising complex questions about civil liability, State responsibility, and the adequacy of existing regulatory frameworks. As hostile UAS operations grow more sophisticated, airports and airlines must urgently reassess their contractual arrangements, insurance coverage, and operational resilience planning to address this evolving threat.
GlobalTransport
Burges Salmon LLP
Burges Salmon LLP