Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2023

Andrew Baker J Imposing Order On Chaos

Quadrant Chambers
Quadrant Chambers
Contributor
Explore more from Quadrant Chambers

The MSC Flaminia and much of its cargo was badly damaged by a container explosion and subsequent fire-fighting efforts.

United KingdomTransport

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. -v- Stolt Tank Containers B.V. and others 'The MSC Flaminia [2022] EWHC 2746 (Admlty)

The MSC Flaminia and much of its cargo was badly damaged by a container explosion and subsequent fire-fighting efforts. Its owner's claim against the time charterer (MSC) for breach of the obligation not to ship dangerous cargo was upheld in arbitration.

MSC sought to limit its liability under the Amended 1976 Limitation Convention. It is of course well established that a charterer cannot limit its liability for damage to the ship (The CMA Djakarta and The Ocean Victory). Undeterred, MSC claimed that it could nonetheless limit its liability in relation to several heads of loss associated with that damage, including salvage charges, ship repair costs and the costs of removing cargo, damaged cargo, waste and firefighting water from the vessel.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from