Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2011

Capital Allowances On Software

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Contributor
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH) is one of the largest full-service business law firms in South Africa,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

The United Kingdom Supreme Court's judgment in Tower MCashback LLP1 v HMRC was reported in the latest Simon's Tax Cases.

United KingdomTax
Alastair Morphet
Alastair Morphet

TAX

The United Kingdom Supreme Court's judgment in Tower MCashback LLP1 v HMRC was reported in the latest Simon's Tax Cases. The nature of the case brought the Supreme Court back to analyse its judgment as the House of Lords in Barclays Mercantile Business Finance Ltd v Mawson (Inspector of Taxes) [2005] STC 1. The case involved two LLPs, where the members were individuals with large incomes who put up only 25% of the consideration paid for acquiring the rights in software. The remaining 75% was provided by interest-free loans on non-recourse terms, made to the investor members by Special Purposes Vehicles set up for the purpose. The appellant partnerships were seeking capital allowance on the bits of MRewards technology they had purchased. As Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe put it, those familiar with the leading cases in this troublesome area of the law will not be surprised to hear that the LLPs rely strongly on the decision in Barclays Mercantile, and seek to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from