Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 AUGUST 2017

‘Information' Or ‘Advice'? Construction Professionals Beware!

This article, by Ian Masser and Ben Spannuth, considers the key points of the judgment and its potential impact on construction professionals (which has recently been the subject of much comment...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The Supreme Court recently provided guidance on the operation of the 'SAAMCO' cap in the landmark case of BPE Solicitors & Anor vs Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel) [2017] UKSC 21 ('BPE Solicitors v Hughes- Holland'). Beale & Company Solicitors LLP acted on behalf of BPE Solicitors. A full summary of the background and judgment can be found here.

This article considers the key points of the judgment and its potential impact on construction professionals (which has recently been the subject of much comment and hypothesis from practitioners). However, the recent decision in Bank of Ireland and another v Watts Group Plc [2017] EWHC 1667 (TCC), considered below, goes some way to clarifying the principles set out in SAAMCO and BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland and their application to construction professionals.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from