Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2016

Will LPA Shaming And Intervention Work To Incentivise Plan Making?

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

In this blog, part of our series on the Government's technical consultation on implementation of the planning changes (the Consultation), we discuss how the Government is proposing to deliver on its commitment to get local plans in place by 2017.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In this blog, part of our series on the Government's technical consultation on implementation of the planning changes (the Consultation), we discuss how the Government is proposing to deliver on its commitment to get local plans in place by 2017.

As outlined in our earlier blog, clauses 129 – 133 of the Housing and Planning Bill are intended to incentivise and control the plan-making process, with the ultimate sanction being the intervention of the Secretary of State – the Secretary of State will be able to reject, write or correct local plans.

Chapter 6 of the Consultation sets out the Government's proposed criteria for deciding when to intervene in the plan making process. It suggests that the priority or target authorities for intervention are those where:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from