Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2019

When Should A Judgment Be Set Aside For Fraud?

This case concerns Balber Kaur Takhar (the Appellant) and her cousin Parkash Kaur Krishan (the third Respondent) who, having not seen each other for many years,

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Takhar (Appellant) v Gracefield Developments Limited and others (Respondents) [2019] UKSC 13

Background Facts

This case concerns Balber Kaur Takhar (the Appellant) and her cousin Parkash Kaur Krishan (the third Respondent) who, having not seen each other for many years, became reacquainted in 2004. During this time, Mrs Takhar was suffering personal and financial problems, having separated from her husband five years previously. Mrs Takhar had acquired a number of properties in Coventry as part of the arrangements with her former husband. Financial problems arose from the dilapidated condition of some of the properties and, in 2005, it was agreed between Mrs Takhar and the Krishans that legal title to the properties would be transferred to a newly formed company Gracefield Developments Limited, of which Mrs Takhar and the Krishans were directors and shareholders.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from