Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2014

Variations To Construction Contracts - When A Liquidated Damages Clause May Become Unenforceable

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Construction contracts often contain liquidated damages clauses which set a pre-determined level of damages that the employer is entitled to recover should certain specified breaches occur.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Construction contracts often contain liquidated damages (LDs) clauses which set a pre-determined level of damages that the employer is entitled to recover should certain specified breaches occur (most commonly delay).  Such clauses promote certainty and help to avoid the need for costly and protracted legal proceedings.

To be enforceable, the level of damages must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss.  This should generally be assessed at the date the contract was entered into.  However, the recent case of Unaoil Ltd v Leighton Offshore Pte Ltd 1, considered whether an LDs clause could become unenforceable if it was not re-considered following a variation to the contract.

THE CASE

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from