Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2012

They Protesteth Too Much: Construction Sites And Protesters

The recent High Court litigation involving the Olympic Delivery Authority ("ODA") and protestors at Leyton Marsh sheds light on how the law assists owners and occupiers of construction sites against obstructive protesters.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Fritha Wheeler-Ozanne
Fritha Wheeler-Ozanne

The recent High Court litigation involving the Olympic Delivery Authority ("ODA") and protestors at Leyton Marsh sheds light on how the law assists owners and occupiers of construction sites against obstructive protesters.

The Facts

The ODA is the body responsible for the planning and delivery of the Olympic Games, 2012.  As part of its remit, the ODA is obliged to build a number of venues, including a basketball facility within an area known as Leyton Marsh.  The ODA was obliged to (and did) deliver this particular venue to the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games ("LOCOG") by 7 June 2012.

The basketball facility is a temporary one and, as part of the planning permission for the venue, the ODA is obliged to remove the facility and reinstate the land by October 2012.  Notwithstanding this, there was considerable outrage from local residents (and others, including "Occupy London") who took to obstructing access to the site by a number

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from