Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2026

The Providence v Hexagon Ruling: Implications For JCT Contracts

A notable case has recently been decided in the Supreme Court, centred on the interpretation of JCT contract provisions about an employer's delayed payments and the contractor's right to terminate.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

A notable case has recently been decided in the Supreme Court, centred on the interpretation of JCT contract provisions about an employer's delayed payments and the contractor's right to terminate.

Many construction projects are delivered under JCTs and so the principles emerging from this case are very relevant, and encompass contract interpretation, strict compliance with contractual terms and the option to amend standard form contracts to reflect commercial objectives.

What were the facts?

In brief, Hexagon Housing Association Limited (the Employer) entered into an amended JCT Design and Build Contract (2016 edition) (the Contract) with Providence Building Services Limited (the Contractor).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from