Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2014

The End Of Leases?

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

Moving to new premises is expensive and disruptive for a business.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Moving to new premises is expensive and disruptive for a business. This prompts many tenants to renew their leases when they expire.

If a tenant is deciding whether to stay or go, and the landlord isn't exactly bothered by other prospective tenants, it can be convenient for both parties to let the tenant's occupation drift on in the short term. A property lawyer would call this "holding over".  It's a pragmatic approach, but tenants should be aware of the risks.

As a first step, it's critical to find out whether the lease in question has security of tenure under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. 

The recent case of Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Limited v Erimus Housing Limited [2014] EWHC Civ 303 is relevant if you don't have security of tenure. After a lease ended the parties conducted on/off lease negotiations for over two years while the tenant stayed in the building. Shortly after heads of terms were agreed, the tenant decided it really needed somewhere

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from