Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2021

Speak Now, Or Forever Hold Your Peace: Challenging Adjudicator's Decisions

A recent decision in the TCC serves as an important reminder that if a party is dissatisfied with an adjudication decision, it should not delay in making its challenges to the decision...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Lauren Melnyk
Lauren Melnyk

A recent decision in the TCC serves as an important reminder that if a party is dissatisfied with an adjudication decision, it should not delay in making its challenges to the decision, especially if involved in serial adjudications.

The case of Prater Ltd v John Sisk and Son (Holdings) Ltd [2021] EWHC 1113 (TCC)) concerned a challenge to an adjudicator's jurisdiction based on alleged invalidity of a previous adjudicator's decision.

Background

The defendant, Sisk, had engaged the claimant, Prater, under an NEC3 Engineering and Construction sub-contract to carry out works to a new Boeing Fleet aircraft maintenance hangar, office and plant room at Gatwick Airport.

The parties had been involved in a series of adjudications arising out of the sub-contract and this case concerned the application for Summary Judgment for the enforcement of the fourth adjudication decision, the only adjudication whereby payment was sought as a remedy.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from