Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MAY 2015

Restrictive Schemes: Birdlip Limited V Hunter

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

The Claimant was bound by restrictive covenants attached to lots of a building scheme. The claim was thus dismissed.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Summary

The Claimant was bound by restrictive covenants attached to lots of a building scheme. The claim was thus dismissed.

Facts

The parties own adjoining plots of land. These plots were originally sold by the same vendor as part of several plot sales over a century ago, subject to restrictive covenants providing against the construction of more than "one or two detached residences" on each plot. The Claimant's plot already had one house on it and the Claimant obtained planning permission to construct two more. 

The Claimant sought a declaration that it was not bound by the restrictive covenant.  

Issues

Whether the covenants were enforceable under a building scheme for the benefit of the other properties on the estate. In particular:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from