We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2006
Recent Important Decisions And Their Practical Application
Keating Chambers
Following the decision in Murphy v. Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 A.C. 398, HL it was generally thought that the scope for the imposition of a duty of care not to cause economic loss was severely restricted. For some 13 years prior to that it was thought that if there was sufficient proximity between wrongdoer and claimant and no considerations to negative the imposition of a duty of care, a cause of action would arise when a building presented a present or imminent danger to health or saf
United KingdomReal Estate and Construction











