Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JUNE 2015

Prematurity Back In Its Box Again

Dentons
Dentons
Contributor
Dentons

Dentons

The Firm Across over 80 countries, Dentons helps you grow, protect, operate and finance your...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dentons

The publication of the NPPF in March 2012 raised questions about the approach to prematurity.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The publication of the NPPF in March 2012 raised questions about the approach to prematurity. Refusal on prematurity grounds has been rare, but Nick Boles announced a 12 month extension in July 2014 of the recovery of planning appeals for consideration by the Secretary of State, to include those where a Neighbourhood Plan (NP) has been made or submitted. It was anticipated that NPPF policy would be applied – with limited weight being given to emerging NPs, becoming stronger as submission, examination and referendum stages had progressed (and depending on how far objectively assessed needs (OAN) are being met).

The issue has been political football, though, receiving a big kick before the General Election. Three recovered appeal schemes – between 100 and 350 homes – (at East Stafford, Sayers Common and Devizes) were refused against Inspector recommendations. Early stage NPs trumped inadequate housing land supply. The fallout helpfully clarifies the correct approach.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from