Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2018

Implied Terms And Entire Agreement Clauses

In the March 2018 case of J N Hipwell & Son v Szurek [2018] EWCA Civ 674

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

In the March 2018 case of J N Hipwell & Son v Szurek [2018] EWCA Civ 674, the Court of Appeal held that a term should be implied into a lease requiring the landlord to keep the electrical installations for the premises safe and certified despite the fact that the lease contained an entire agreement clause.

Background

A tenant of café premises brought a claim against her former landlord for losses she had suffered as a result of her being forced to close her business due to issues she had been experiencing with the electrical wiring in the premises.

The lease was silent upon which party was responsible for the repair and maintenance of the electrical installations and it contained a standard entire agreement clause (as well as a non-reliance clause in respect of any pre-contract representations made by the landlord).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from